Psychology worksheet

CBT Diamond Worksheet: Thoughts, Feelings, Behaviours and Body

A free, printable CBT worksheet for mapping one situation across thoughts, emotions, behaviours and body sensations, and finding the easiest point to change.

The CBT diamond is a simple map of how an experience hangs together: what you think, what you feel, what you do and what happens in your body, all influencing one another (J. S. Beck, 2020; Greenberger & Padesky, 2016). This CBT diamond worksheet helps you describe each point for one situation, trace the loops between them and choose one point to change. It extends the familiar CBT triangle by giving physical sensations their own corner.

Edit worksheet

Updated 24 September 202615 research references

See this worksheet in a theme

Preview of a CBT Diamond Worksheet connecting thoughts, emotions, behaviours and body or physiology.
The full worksheet. Download it as a PDF, or open it in the builder to edit the wording and design.

What's on this worksheet

The worksheet is titled “CBT Diamond: Thoughts, Behaviours, Emotions and Physiology” and has 6 sections.

Choose one specific situation. Describe each point of the diamond, then notice how a change in one part could influence the others. Arrows show interaction, not blame or a single fixed order.

  1. Situation. Briefly record what happened, where and when it occurred, and who was involved. Space to write.
  2. The CBT Diamond. Select a node to edit its wording. Use the prompts below to add detail for this situation. Diagram: Thoughts, Emotions, Behaviours, Body / physiology.
  3. Map each point. Use exact words, actions, emotion names, and physical sensations rather than broad judgments. Table with columns for Thoughts / images, Emotions (0–10), Behaviours / urges, Body sensations.
  4. How are the four parts linked? Describe at least one loop—for example, how a thought changed an emotion, which changed an urge or body response. Space to write.
  5. One point I can influence. Choose a balanced thought, helpful behaviour, emotion-regulation skill, or body-based strategy to try. Space to write.
  6. What changed? After trying the strategy, note any shift in thoughts, emotions, behaviour, or physiology—even a small one. Space to write.

What is the CBT diamond?

Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) rests on the idea that our emotional, behavioural and physical reactions are shaped by how we interpret a situation, not by the situation alone (Beck, 1976). Judith Beck’s cognitive model sets this out as a situation, an automatic thought and a reaction that is emotional, behavioural and physiological (J. S. Beck, 2020). The diamond simply draws those four parts as connected points.

You may have seen the same idea drawn differently. The CBT triangle, or cognitive triangle, links thoughts, feelings and behaviours. Padesky and Mooney’s five-part model, sometimes called the ‘hot cross bun’, adds physical reactions and places all four inside the person’s environment (Padesky & Mooney, 1990; Greenberger & Padesky, 2016). The Five Areas model used in UK services also adds life situation, relationships and practical problems (Williams & Garland, 2002). The worksheet’s situation box plays the role of that outer circle.

The arrows run in every direction. A thought can change a feeling, a body sensation can change a thought, and an action can change all three. That is why a change at any one point can help (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).

The four points of the CBT diamond

Each point captures a different kind of information. Being specific at each one, using exact words, actions and sensations rather than broad judgements, makes the links easier to see (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016; Kuyken et al., 2009).

Thoughts

The words and images that go through your mind, including predictions and judgements. In the cognitive model these are the automatic thoughts that shape the other three points (J. S. Beck, 2020). Include images too, which tend to trigger stronger emotion than words (Holmes & Mathews, 2010).

Examples
“I’m going to make a fool of myself.” An image of people laughing.
Ask yourself
What was going through my mind? What was I afraid would happen?

Emotions

Feelings named in a single word, such as anxious, sad, angry, ashamed or guilty, with an intensity rating from 0 to 10 (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016). Naming feelings precisely is linked with better emotion regulation (Kashdan et al., 2015).

Examples
Anxious 8/10, embarrassed 6/10.
Ask yourself
What did I feel, and how strongly?

Behaviours and urges

What you did, or felt the urge to do, including what you avoided. Behaviour matters because it can keep a problem going: safety-seeking actions such as avoiding eye contact can prevent you from discovering that the feared outcome would not happen (Salkovskis, 1991).

Examples
Stayed at the back of the room, rehearsed what to say, left early.
Ask yourself
What did I do, avoid or feel like doing?

Body sensations

Physical changes such as a racing heart, tight chest, heat, tension or heaviness. Different emotions produce distinct and consistent patterns of bodily sensation (Nummenmaa et al., 2014), and misreading those sensations as dangerous can fuel anxiety, as in the cognitive model of panic (Clark, 1986).

Examples
Racing heart, hot face, shaky hands, knot in the stomach.
Ask yourself
What did I notice in my body?

CBT diamond examples

These two examples show the kind of loop the worksheet helps you find. In each, one point feeds another until the cycle keeps itself going (Kuyken et al., 2009).

Example 1: speaking up in a meeting

A social anxiety loop, where safety behaviours stop the fear from being tested (Salkovskis, 1991).

Situation
Monday team meeting. My manager asks for updates.
Thoughts
“I’ll stumble over my words and everyone will notice.”
Emotions
Anxious 8/10.
Body
Heart pounding, face hot, dry mouth.
Behaviours
Kept my update very short and avoided eye contact.
The loop
Noticing my hot face made me think ‘they can see I’m nervous’, which raised the anxiety. Keeping it short meant I never found out that people were barely paying attention.
Point to influence
Behaviour: give the full update next week and look at one friendly face.

Example 2: a low weekend

A low mood loop, where withdrawing from activity deepens the mood. Behavioural activation targets exactly this point (Ekers et al., 2014).

Situation
Saturday, nothing planned.
Thoughts
“There’s no point going out. I won’t enjoy it.”
Emotions
Sad 6/10, flat.
Body
Heavy, tired, slow.
Behaviours
Stayed in bed and scrolled on my phone until the afternoon.
The loop
Staying in bed made me feel more tired and flat, which seemed to confirm that going out would be pointless.
Point to influence
Behaviour: a 20-minute walk to the café before deciding how I feel.

How to use the CBT diamond worksheet

Choose one recent, specific situation rather than a general problem. The aim is to describe what happened clearly, see how the parts connect and pick one place to intervene (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016; Kuyken et al., 2009).

  1. Write a short, factual description of the situation: what happened, where, when and who was involved.
  2. Fill in each point of the diamond in the ‘Map each point’ table, using exact words, emotion names with a 0–10 rating, actions and physical sensations (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).
  3. In ‘How are the four parts linked?’, describe at least one loop, for example how a thought changed a feeling, which changed what you did. The arrows show influence, not blame or a fixed order (Kuyken et al., 2009).
  4. Choose one point you can influence. That might be a balanced thought, a different action, an emotion-regulation skill or a body-based strategy such as slowing your breathing (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).
  5. Try the strategy, then note in ‘What changed?’ any shift at any point, even a small one.
  6. To work on the thought point in more depth, use a thought record worksheet. To track the emotion and body points across a day, use the daily emotion log (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).

Using the CBT diamond in therapy

The diamond is a quick, shared way to build a maintenance formulation early in therapy. Collaborative case conceptualisation starts from descriptions like this and builds towards an explanation of why a problem persists (Kuyken et al., 2009). The five-part model was designed specifically to make the cognitive model easy to present to clients (Padesky & Mooney, 1990).

Mapping a client’s own example tends to show several possible entry points. Cognitive methods target the thoughts corner; behavioural activation targets behaviour and has strong evidence in depression, with a meta-analysis of 26 trials finding it more effective than control conditions (Ekers et al., 2014); and panic treatment targets the loop between body sensations and catastrophic thoughts (Clark, 1986).

Because the worksheet is editable, you can rename a point to suit a client, for example ‘body’ instead of ‘physiology’, or add a fifth box for environment.

Does the CBT model help?

The diamond is a way of presenting the cognitive model, which underpins CBT. CBT has one of the broadest evidence bases in psychological therapy: a review of 269 meta-analyses found the strongest support in anxiety disorders, somatoform disorders, bulimia, anger control problems and general stress (Hofmann et al., 2012). NICE recommends CBT and behavioural activation among its treatments for depression in adults (NICE, 2022).

The value of the diamond is that it makes the model personal. Seeing your own loop can make it clearer why a strategy is worth trying, and practising between sessions is linked with better outcomes in CBT (Kazantzis et al., 2010).

Things to keep in mind

The diamond describes a moment; it does not explain everything. Life circumstances, relationships and practical problems also shape how people feel, which is why broader models include them (Williams & Garland, 2002).

Physical symptoms can have medical causes. If you notice new or worrying body sensations, check them with a doctor rather than assuming they are anxiety. If you are struggling, or having thoughts of harming yourself, speak with a GP, psychologist or other qualified professional.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between the CBT triangle and the CBT diamond?

The CBT triangle links thoughts, feelings and behaviours. The diamond adds body sensations as a fourth point, in line with the cognitive model’s emotional, behavioural and physiological reactions (J. S. Beck, 2020; Padesky & Mooney, 1990).

What is the hot cross bun model?

It is a nickname for Padesky and Mooney’s five-part model, which shows thoughts, moods, behaviours and physical reactions interacting inside the person’s environment. Drawn as a circle divided into four, it looks like a hot cross bun (Padesky & Mooney, 1990; Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).

What is the five areas model?

The Five Areas model, developed by Chris Williams and Anne Garland, looks at life situation, relationships and practical problems; altered thinking; altered emotions; altered physical symptoms; and altered behaviour (Williams & Garland, 2002).

Which point of the diamond should I change first?

Whichever is easiest to change right now. Behaviour is often a practical starting point, especially with low mood, where behavioural activation has strong evidence (Ekers et al., 2014). Thoughts, emotions and body responses are all valid entry points (Greenberger & Padesky, 2016).

Can body sensations change thoughts?

Yes. In the cognitive model of panic, normal sensations such as a racing heart are misinterpreted as signs of danger, which increases anxiety and the sensations themselves (Clark, 1986).

Is the CBT diamond suitable for children?

The four-part map is simple enough to adapt for younger clients, using words like ‘what I thought’, ‘what I felt’, ‘what I did’ and ‘what my body did’. Presenting the model in plain language was the original purpose of the five-part model (Padesky & Mooney, 1990).

References

  1. Beck, A. T. (1976). Cognitive therapy and the emotional disorders. International Universities Press.
  2. Beck, J. S. (2020). Cognitive behavior therapy: Basics and beyond (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  3. Clark, D. M. (1986). A cognitive approach to panic. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 24(4), 461–470. doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(86)90011-2
  4. Ekers, D., Webster, L., Van Straten, A., Cuijpers, P., Richards, D., & Gilbody, S. (2014). Behavioural activation for depression; an update of meta-analysis of effectiveness and sub group analysis. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e100100. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100100
  5. Greenberger, D., & Padesky, C. A. (2016). Mind over mood: Change how you feel by changing the way you think (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  6. Hofmann, S. G., Asnaani, A., Vonk, I. J. J., Sawyer, A. T., & Fang, A. (2012). The efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy: A review of meta-analyses. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 36(5), 427–440. doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9476-1
  7. Holmes, E. A., & Mathews, A. (2010). Mental imagery in emotion and emotional disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(3), 349–362. doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.01.001
  8. Kashdan, T. B., Barrett, L. F., & McKnight, P. E. (2015). Unpacking emotion differentiation: Transforming unpleasant experience by perceiving distinctions in negativity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(1), 10–16. doi.org/10.1177/0963721414550708
  9. Kazantzis, N., Whittington, C., & Dattilio, F. (2010). Meta-analysis of homework effects in cognitive and behavioral therapy: A replication and extension. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 17(2), 144–156. doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01204.x
  10. Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2009). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Guilford Press.
  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2022). Depression in adults: Treatment and management (NICE guideline NG222). www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng222
  12. Nummenmaa, L., Glerean, E., Hari, R., & Hietanen, J. K. (2014). Bodily maps of emotions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(2), 646–651. doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1321664111
  13. Padesky, C. A., & Mooney, K. A. (1990). Presenting the cognitive model to clients. International Cognitive Therapy Newsletter, 6, 13–14.
  14. Salkovskis, P. M. (1991). The importance of behaviour in the maintenance of anxiety and panic: A cognitive account. Behavioural Psychotherapy, 19(1), 6–19. doi.org/10.1017/S0141347300011472
  15. Williams, C., & Garland, A. (2002). A cognitive–behavioural therapy assessment model for use in everyday clinical practice. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 8(3), 172–179. doi.org/10.1192/apt.8.3.172